(In comparison, the iPhone XS covers 123 percent.) The Pixel 3 also offers multiple display profiles for more or less-saturated colors, while the iPhone XS provides no such option to users. The colors on Google's flagship are vibrant, as evidenced by its 202-percent coverage of the sRGB color space. The iPhone XS's panel may be just a little better, though that's not to say the Pixel 3' is bad by any stretch. Unfortunately though, the Pixel 3's screen falls just shy of being the finest we've seen among smartphones. That said, the iPhone XS is undoubtedly the direction the industry is headed, and the iPhone X's success proves that Apple's struck a fashionable formula that consumers love, earning it the win here.Īt long last, Google gave the Pixel 3 the OLED display it desperately needed to contend with Apple and Samsung’s best efforts. The Pixel 3 wins points for its relative lightness compared with the iPhone XS (it's an ounce lighter), and those who have a distaste for notches will surely prefer Google's effort to Apple's latest range of devices (or, for that matter, any other flagship). However, early reports indicate this surface may be more susceptible to scratching. Both handsets employ glass backs allowing them to charge wirelessly, though a significant portion of the Pixel 3's is finished with an etching process that delivers a matte texture. Around the sides, the iPhone XS incorporates more premium-feeling stainless steel to the Pixel 3's glossy aluminum.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |